UEFA chooses to drop Armenia versus Azerbaijan matches and give the two sides zero focuses. While Armenia needed to play as per UEFA administers and was prepared to have a match in Armenia and travel to Baku for the trade game, Azerbaijan would not have Armenia and travel to Yerevan, in this manner conflicting with the set up UEFA rules. As a rule right now a circumstance UEFA rebuffs the side that conflicts with the built up rules. Right now and Azerbaijan are rebuffed in an equivalent manner. In the event that UEFA was going to state on the off chance that Armenia and Azerbaijan fall in a similar gathering we will drop the matches except if they consented to play in an unbiased game, it should had done this before the groups were chosen so everybody would know the standards.
Presently, both UEFA and Azerbaijan change controls in the game. This tosses a major shade on the fair-mindedness and authority or UEFA. The UEFA Executive Committee, led by UEFA President Michel Plating, finished it is meeting today late morning, at the Abe Olestra arena in, in front of this evening’s UEFA European Under-21 Championship Final. Additionally explored was the circumstance with respect to the area of the matches to be played between Armenia and Azerbaijan, in the UEFA EURO 2008TM qualifying rivalry. As no reasonable trade off could be found between the two affiliations it was chosen to drop the Bandar Bola Terpercaya matches, to be specific Azerbaijan-Armenia planned for 8 September and Armenia-Azerbaijan plan for 12 September, and to grant the two affiliations zero focuses for the matches.
Truly UEFA has the privilege to drop matches, however of two gatherings give assent. Armenia has over and again said that it would not consent to dropping. Presently the games are dropped with the two gatherings granted zero focuses. As you notice in the citation as no appropriate trade off could be found between the two affiliations. So on the off chance that one of the national groups of UEFA needs to damage the guidelines of UEFA games the arrangement is to locate an appropriate trade off or to rebuff the violator? I trust the jury to decide wisely. This is not simply and not reasonable. Soccer, sports and legislative issues ought not to blend. Indeed Armenia imagined that making a trip to Baku and facilitating the National Soccer Team of Azerbaijan could be a cooperative attitude motion toward making a commitment to a harmony procedure haggled by the OSCE. UEFA ought to have thought about this and grant this methodology. Armenia is rebuffed with a zero focuses for not consenting to play in a nonpartisan field. Yerevan needed to play as indicated by the principles of the UEFA game.
